Full text

      
10.1186/s40409-017-0106-y

Research article - Vol. 23, 2017

 

A clinical trial protocol to treat massive Africanized honeybee (Apis mellifera) attack with a new apilic antivenom

 

Alexandre Naime Barbosa1, Leslie Boyer2, Jean-Philippe Chippaux3 4, Natalia Bronzatto Medolago5, Carlos Antonio Caramori6, Ariane Gomes Paixão1, João Paulo Vasconcelos Poli1, Mônica Bannwart Mendes1, Lucilene Delazari dos Santos7, Rui Seabra Ferreira Jr1 7, Benedito Barraviera1 7

 

1 Department of Tropical Diseases, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

2 VIPER Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.

3 CERPAGE, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.

4 UMR216, Mère et enfant face aux infections tropicales and PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

5 Clinical Research Unit (UPECLIN), Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

6 Department of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

7 Center for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals, São Paulo State University (UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista), Av. José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, Fazenda Experimental Lageado, Botucatu, SP CEP 18.610-307, Brazil.

 

ABSTRACT

Background

Envenomation caused by multiple stings from Africanized honeybees Apis mellifera constitutes a public health problem in the Americas. In 2015, the Brazilian Ministry of Health reported 13,597 accidents (incidence of seven cases per 100,000 inhabitants) with 39 deaths (lethality of 0.25%). The toxins present in the venom, which include melittin and phospholipase A2, cause lesions in diverse organs and systems that may be fatal. As there has been no specific treatment to date, management has been symptomatic and supportive only.

 

Methods

In order to evaluate the safety and neutralizing capacity of a new apilic antivenom, as well as to confirm its lowest effective dose, a clinical protocol was developed to be applied in a multicenter, non-randomized and open phase I/II clinical trial. Twenty participants with more than five stings, aged more than 18 years, of both sexes, who have not previously received the heterologous serum against bee stings, will be included for 24 months. The proposed dose was based on the antivenom neutralizing capacity and the number of stings. Treatment will be administered only in a hospital environment and the participants will be evaluated for a period up to 30 days after discharge for clinical and laboratory follow-up.

 

Results

This protocol, approved by the Brazilian regulatory agencies for ethics (National Commission for Ethics on Research – CONEP) and sanitation (National Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA), is a guideline constituted by specific, adjuvant, symptomatic and complementary treatments, in addition to basic orientations for conducting a clinical trial involving heterologous sera.

 

Conclusions

This is the first clinical trial protocol designed specifically to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of a new antivenom against stings from the Africanized honeybee Apis mellifera. The results will support future studies to confirm a new treatment for massive bee attack that has a large impact on public health in the Americas.

 

Key words: Apis mellifera; Bee venom; Toxins; Envenomation; Heterologous serum; Apilic antivenom; Bee antivenom.

 

Funding

This study was partially supported by funds from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) granted to RSF Jr. (process n. 2012/08101-8), and from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) granted to BB (process n. 401170/2013-6). This work was also supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) through Edital Toxinologia n. 063/2010, process n. 230.38.006285/2011-21, AUXPE Toxinologia 1219/2011 and by the Department of Science and Technology (DECIT) and the Secretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs (SCTIE), CNPq process n. 401170/2013-6, of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. RSF Jr. is a CNPq DTI fellow researcher (310395/2014-3).

 

Received: January 11, 2017.

Revised: March 7, 2017.

Accepted: March 16, 2017.

 

Correspondence: bbviera@cevap.unesp.br; bbviera@gmail.com

 

Authors’ contributions

ANB, LB, JPC, NBM, CAC, AGP, JPVP, MBM and LDS researched the literature, discussed the proposal and wrote the paper. RSF Jr., LB, JPC and BB corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 

Competing interests

One of the authors of this article, Dr. Benedito Barraviera, is the Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases. He did not get involved in the peer review process of this manuscript. The author declare that they have no competing interests.

 

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

 

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Botucatu Medical School (CAAE: 19006813.4.1001.5411) on October 21, 2013 (clinical protocol version 1), December 1, 2014 (clinical protocol version 2), and on June 6, 2016 (clinical protocol version 3). The study was authorized by ANVISA on February 5, 2016 (special communication n. 11/2016, process n. 25351.611582/2014-93, CE expedient: 1215967161).

 

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.